A clear case of
United Nations vs United Nations.
This was the scenario
posed by senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson as he calls out the call of a UN
official asking President Rodrigo Roa Duterte not to sign the Anti-Terrorism
bill.
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet and senator Panfilo “Ping” Lacson(photo credit to owner) |
Bachelete said the signing of the measure into a law will ““heightens our concerns on the blurring of important distinctions between criticism, criminality and terrorism.”
“We crafted the
proposed Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 based on the guidelines and standards set
by the United Nations Security Council’s (UNSC) Resolution 1373. It was the UN
that prodded the Philippines to strengthen its laws against terrorism,” senator
Lacson said in a statement.
“So, is this the United Nations going up against the United Nations? The
problem with the critics of the Anti-Terrorism Bill like the UN High
Commissioner (for) Human Rights and the others is that they criticize without
even reading the bill itself,” he added.
Lacson points out that the UNSC resolution declared that “planning and
preparation, among others, are established as serious criminal offenses in
domestic laws and that the punishment should duly reflect the seriousness of
such terrorist acts.”
Please like and share our Facebook posts to
support The PH Chronicles.
Do not hesitate to share us your thoughts and
opinions in the comment section below. For more news updates, feel free to
visit our site often.
Stay
updated with today's relevant news and trends by hitting the LIKE button.
Thanks
for dropping by and reading this post.
Report from PDI
Disclaimer:
Contributed articles does not reflect the view of THE PH CHRONICLES. This website cannot
guarantee the legitimacy of some of the information contributed to us. You may
do additional research if you find some information doubtful. No part of this
article maybe reproduced without permission from this website.
0 Comments