One of the county's Legal titan presents his reasons as to why the OSG is correct in asking the Supreme Court to decide on the ABS-CBN issue

One of the county's Legal titan presents his reasons as to why the OSG is correct in asking the Supreme Court to decide on the ABS-CBN issue

Do you really want to know what is happening or what has happened with the media giant ABS-CBN that led to this difficult and peculiar situation it is in right now.
A lot has been going around news, opinions, and conclusions have been made regarding the situation ABS-CBN has into it all depends who do you want to listen - those in favor of the automatic renewal of its legislative franchise or those who want to face the consequences for its alleged violations as against its franchise as granted by the State which is now being pursued by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) in the Supreme Court.

Here below, Daily Tribune was able to get hold of former Senate President, Justice Secretary, and a legal titan in his own right Juan Ponce Enrile where he scholarly presented the ABS-CBN  situation to its barest core and has pinpointed for us what could be the real problem that made the OSG file its petition asking once and for all to settle the issue that would really be of value for the generation of Filipinos in the future.
(photo credit to owner)
Please see the full quote below for purposes of informing the public, clarity and full understanding of former Senate President Enrile’s article titled “ABS-CBN Conundrum” that was published in the Daily Tribune.

ABS-CBN conundrum

The ownership and management of mass media shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or association, wholly owned and managed by such citizens.

The central figure of a contentious legal and political problem in our society today is ABS-CBN — the largest and, to me, the most powerful and influential media entity in the country.
The ABS-CBN problem revolves principally around the validity and extension of its expiring congressional franchise. The problem threw Congress in a quandary and discord, and pushed the government to file a quo warranto proceeding against ABS-CBN Corporation before the Supreme Court.
It also aroused a cacophony of diverse opinions among businessmen, lawyers and ordinary people in our general public.
The problem of ABS-CBN actually started years ago. On 30 March 1999, a thinly capitalized corporation named Worldtech Holdings Corporation, was organized. The authorized capital stock of Worldtech Holdings then was only P1,000.00, divided into 1,000 common shares, and with a par value each of P1. The owners of 400 subscribed and issued shares of Worldtech Holdings were Lopez Inc., 50 percent, and certain directors and officers of Lopez Inc., 50 percent. All are admittedly Filipinos. The primary purpose of Worldtech Holdings was to invest, purchase and hold real and personal properties, shares of stock, bonds, debentures, notes, evidence of indebtedness, or other securities or obligations.

On 16 September 1999, the name of Worldtech Holdings was changed to and became ABS-CBN Holdings Corporation.
From 30 March 1999 until today, Worldtech Holdings (now ABS-CBN Holdings) never had any business of its own. It is more of a shell corporation created with no other business purpose of its own than as sole issuer of Philippine Deposit Receipts (PDR), and as a receptacle and custodian of common shares of ABS-CBN Corporation transferred to it from Lopez Inc. pursuant to a financial scheme devised by its Filipino owners.
Clearly, the creation of ABS-CBN Holdings was intended simply to circumvent and overcome the Filipino ownership requirement of the Constitution for mass media. These can be gleaned from its financial records in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

These are what the financial records of ABS-CBN Holdings in the SEC disclosed:
“On 29 September 1999, the Company offered 132,000,000 PDR relating to 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares. Each PDR was issued for a total consideration of P46.00, which consists of a deposit of P45.90 and a PDR option price of P0.10.”
“Each PDR grants the holder, upon the payment of the exercise price… the delivery of one ABS-CBN share or the sale of and delivery of the proceeds of such sale of one ABS-CBN share. The Company remains to be the registered owner of the ABS-CBN shares covered by the PDR. The Company also retains the voting rights over the ABS-CBN shares.”
“Immediately prior to the closing of the PDR offering… Lopez Inc. transferred 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares to the company in relation to which the PDR were issued. For as long as the PDR are not exercised, these shares underlying the PDR are, and will continue, to be registered in the name of and owned by, and all rights pertaining to these shares, including voting rights, shall be exercised by the company. The obligations of the company to deliver the ABS-CBN shares on the exercise of the right contained in the PDR are secured by the pledge of shares in favor of the security agent acting on behalf of each holder of a PDR over the ABS-CBN shares.”

“The company has not conducted any business other than in connection with the issuance of Philippine Depositary Receipts (PDR), the performance of obligation under the PDR and the acquisition and holding of shares of ABS-CBN Corporation (ABS-CBN) in respect of PDR issued.”
“Any cash dividend or other cash distribution distributed in respect of ABS-CBN shares received by the company (or the security agent on its behalf) shall be applied towards the operating expenses then due of the company (including but not limited to applicable taxes, fees, and maintenance costs charged by the Philippine Stock Exchange shown as ‘Operating Expenses’ in the statements of comprehensive income) for the current and preceding years. Any further amount equal to the Operating Expenses in the preceding year (the ‘Operating Fund’) shall be set aside to meet operating or other expenses for the succeeding years. Any amount in excess of the aggregate of the Operating Expense paid and the Operating Fund for such period (referred to as ‘interest’) shall be distributed to holders pro-rata on the day after such cash dividends are received by the company.”

The word “company” in those quoted words refers to ABS-CBN Holdings and the word “holders” in the immediately preceding paragraph refers to the holders of PDR.
From those disclosures and admissions of ABS-CBN Holdings in its financial records in the SEC, it is clear that it is nothing but an alter ego of Lopez Inc. Its corporate existence was an expedient measure to skirt something that was probably prohibited by law. Its corporate veil could, therefore, be pierced.
Also, from those disclosures, my question is: What was the consideration, if any, received by Lopez Inc. when it transferred to ABS-CBN Holdings 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares before the closing of the PDR offering?
Was it the 132,000,000 PDR with an issue value each of P46.00, or, in monetary terms, P6,072,000,000, which is the result of multiplying 132,000,000 PDR by P46.00? This was not clearly disclosed and clarified in the financial records of ABS-CBN Holdings in the SEC.

Another question is: Was the transfer of those 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares from Lopez, Inc. to ABS-CBN Holdings free from income taxation?
At the end of September 2019, the financial records of ABS-CBN Holdings in the SEC show the “movements of PDR and the underlying ABS-CBN shares as follows:

(photo credit to Daily Tribune)

From the above figures, it can be gleaned that the original 132,000,000 PDR on 29 September 1999, grew to 327,541,274 in 2017; to 324,930,790 in 2018; and to 320,412,442 at the end of September 2019, with probably a corresponding growth of their counterpart and matching ABS-CBN shares.
It is not farfetched to think that some, if not many, of those huge number of PDR floating around have fallen into the hands of foreigners who have no right whatsoever to have any economic interest in mass media business in the country.

It is also obvious from the financial records of ABS-CBN Holdings in the SEC that the PDR are “securitization” of the 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares that Lopez, Inc. transferred to its alter ego, ABS-CBN Holdings, before the closing of the PDR offering. Those PDR of ABS-CBN Holdings are clones or virtual replications of the 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares it acquired from Lopez, Inc.
The PDR have all the earmarks or attributes of ownership: possession, enjoyment, and disposition.
The holders of PDR have possession of their PDR; they enjoy the fruits or dividends accruing to those 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares; and they can trigger the disposition of any of those 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares through the exercise of the option attached to each PDR. The only right denied to them is the voting rights of those 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares.

A good question to ask is: Can Lopez, Inc. or ABS-CBN Holdings, or both, trigger on their sole discretion the sale of any of those 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares without any holder of a PDR exercising the option attached to a PDR?
I doubt it because the power to trigger the disposition of those 132,000,000 ABS-CBN shares was removed from Lopez, Inc. and ABS-CBN Holdings, the registered owner, and transferred to the holders of PDR.
I think the Solicitor General is correct in raising the issue before the Supreme Court. Article XVI, Section 11(1) provides that “The ownership and management of mass media shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or association, wholly owned and managed by such citizens.” It is about time for the Supreme Court to clarify this issue once and for all for the benefit of the nation.

What can you say about this?

Share us your thoughts by simply leaving on the comment section below. For more news updates, feel free to visit our site often.

Stay updated with today's relevant news and trends by hitting the LIKE button.

Thanks for dropping by and reading this post.

Report from Daily Tribune

Disclaimer: Contributed articles does not reflect the view of THE PH CHRONICLES. This website cannot guarantee the legitimacy of some of the information contributed to us. You may do additional research if you find some information doubtful. No part of this article maybe reproduced without permission from this website.

Post a Comment