The Philippine government rejects the “politically
partisan and one-sided” resolution that would mandate the United Nations Human
Rights Council (UNHRC) to conduct a “comprehensive” review of the human rights
situation in the country.
“The Philippines rejects this resolution. It
cannot, in good conscience, abide by it,” Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro
Locsin Jr. said in a statement read by the Philippines’ Permanent
Representative to the United Nations Evan Garcia after the rights council
agreed to adopt the Iceland-led text during its 41st session in Geneva.
“We will not accept a politically partisan and
one-sided resolution, so detached from the truth on the ground,” Locsin’s
statement further read.
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in session (photo credit to UN) |
18 out of 47 member states of the UNHRC voted in favor of the resolution, 14 voted no while 15 nations abstained.
“We invoke the government’s great power – and
therefore, commensurate responsibility – to protect human rights as
multilateral bodies cannot. Foremost among those rights is the right to be
protected from crime by the state,” he said.
“Do not presume to threaten states with accountability for a tough approach to crushing crime, at which some of your countries are complicit at worst and tolerant at best,” he further said. “You don’t have the wherewithal, so all you can do is insult. The United Nations is a collection of sovereignties and not a sovereign collective.”
“Do not presume to threaten states with accountability for a tough approach to crushing crime, at which some of your countries are complicit at worst and tolerant at best,” he further said. “You don’t have the wherewithal, so all you can do is insult. The United Nations is a collection of sovereignties and not a sovereign collective.”
The foreign affairs secretary
likewise argued that the resolution “was not universally adopted, making its
validity highly questionable.”
“It does not represent the
will of the Council, much less that of the developing countries who are always
the target of such resolutions,” he said.
Locsin added that western countries had “pushed
for this resolution in the confidence that the world has forgotten what they
did and what should have been done to them had there been a Human Rights
Council.”
More than two dozen other countries — mostly
Western nations — backed the resolution, namely Austria, Belgium, Canada,
Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Latvia,
Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands,
New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Slovenia, Sweden, United
Kingdom of Great Britain, and Northern Ireland.
“It was pushed with the
arrogance that developing countries must not stand up to them even if we can
and as we hereby do. There will be consequences,” Locsin said.
What can you say about this?
Share
us your thoughts by simply leaving on the comment section below. For more news
updates, feel free to visit our site often.
Stay
updated with today's relevant news and trends by hitting the LIKE button.
Thanks
for dropping by and reading this post.
Report from PDI
0 Comments