Its been already two (2) years since Rodrigo
Roa Duterte and still political scientists are in awe as to why he still has
remarkable popular support from the Filipino people.
Issues closes to Filipinos heart’s
have hounded his administration like rising prices of basic goods, “shortage of
rice”,record high inflation, unpopular policies like closing of Boracay for
rehabilitation, and seemingly bold
policies with respect to the country’s foreign relations has not made him less
popular as the Philippines elected leader.
If the latest Social Weather Station (SWS) poll would be taken
into consideration the President had 74 percent of Filipinos (based on its
statistical sample) having much trust in him, a clear 4 percentage point rise
from the 2nd quarter poll finding of 70%.
 |
| PRRD with the common Filipino (photo credit to owner) |
No matter what the opposition hurls
against him seems to be backfiring cause it only makes the president more loved
by Filipinos if these popularity surveys will be the gauged of things.
Veteran journalist Rigoberto Tiglao
in his Manila Times column, titled “ Duerte’s popularity surges , despite rise
in prices” lists down 5 major points as to why the former mayor from Davao as
to the healthy, staggering , and robust political support.
For the full appreciation, knowledge
and understanding of Mr. Tiglao’s article we are quoting it in full for our
publics personal consumption.
Duterte’s popularity surges, despite rise in prices
PRESIDENT Duterte’s popular support rose significantly last month, going
by the metric of the Social Weather Stations’ “trust” ratings.
Undertaken from September 15-23, the SWS poll had 74 percent of
Filipinos (based on its statistical sample) having much trust in Duterte, a
four-percentage point rise from its June 27-30 poll finding of 70 percent.
There was a four-percent of Filipinos who moved out of the “undecided” category
to trust the President.
This gut issue of more expensive rice should have pulled down people’s
trust in Duterte as their President. But it didn’t. Although there was a dip in
trust ratings among those who finished college (76 percent to 74 percent), this
rose among the lower classes (based on their educational attainment) that were
the hardest hit by rising prices.
I would think his political support would be stable, and even increase,
especially since inflation is expected to go down in the next few months.
Prices of rice have already started to go down because of both importations and
the start of the harvest period. Those of petroleum products will be receding
because economic growth in the West and China have not been as robust as
expected.
The Yellows’ unpatriotic strategy of getting Western media and even
foreign entities (such the European Parliament and the New York-based Human
Rights Watch) to condemn Duterte as a bloodthirsty tyrant has not swayed the
support of even the thinking and upper classes. Police excesses in undertaking
its anti-drug war have abated, with even much of the Yellow propaganda (such as
the infamous Pieta-like photo of a drug pusher killed) proven to be fake news.
Hearts and minds
What explains Duterte’s robust political support?
For one thing, Duterte government’s infrastructure projects are being
completed now. Its efficiency in governance after two years has been
demonstrated.
But masses’ support of their leader rarely is a matter of rational
analysis and conclusion. Approaching the mid-point of this presidency, Duterte
at this point has basically captured Filipinos’ hearts and minds, with the way
he has projected himself and how he has acted as a leader.
Here are some aspects of this:
First, the one thing about Duterte even his vociferous critics can’t deny is his authenticity, his what-you-see-is-what-you-get portrait, which explains why he seems to have a foul mouth. Having been a full-time journalist through five presidents, I can assert that every one of them tried to be somebody they were really not. Even President Estrada pretended to be one with the masses, even if that was really only his movie persona.
The worst pretender of course was the
spoiled brat Benigno Aquino 3rd.
One could even feel that he was performing
whenever he talked to the public. His sidekick Mar Roxas shouting “P***** ina”
at a rally was a pathetic attempt to be somebody else.clear instance of this was his order to close down Boracay, which,
except for a tiny stratum of environmentalists in the country, was opposed my
most. With the reopening of a cleaned-up and more orderly Boracay the other day
though, he’s been vindicated.
Duterte seems to enjoy shocking people in his speeches and doesn’t care
if the hoity-toity elites are aghast at his curses and invectives. Because of
this, he would have easily been the most unpopular president by this time.
Indisputable brand
Third, he has “branded” himself in his focused-on-one particular scourge which most Filipinos, especially the lower classes, have most detested: illegal drugs.
Duterte’s current indisputable “branding” as the President who will end
once and for all the plague of illegal drugs—though the heavens fall, as it
were, i.e., even if Western media and global institutions condemn him for
allegedly trampling on human rights.
That has been his focus, although it seems he is moving, with the war on
illegal drugs half-way won—“on a scale of one to 10, we’re at six now,” he
says—towards an anti-graft campaign, an issue that also dominates Filipinos’ minds.
That he will demolish the illegal drug industry has been the single message the
masses clearly hear, and they’re happy with it.
But in the meanwhile, his other Cabinet secretaries are doing what they
are supposed to do: Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez has been undertaking a
politically difficult and unpopular tax reform program, Public Works Secretary
Mark Villar is implementing the “build, build, build” program while Environment
Secretary Roy Cimatu cleaned up the cesspool that a once pristine Boracay had
turned into.
Fourth, he has been vocal in defying and challenging the powers-that-be,
which most Filipinos are keenly aware of and abhor.
The default condition of most societies, which make up the obstacle for
a country’s growth, are its ruling elites that defend the status quo. Reforms
would be a walk in the park, if there were no powers-that-be that block these.
Duterte has challenged not only the worst of the economic elites who
have, among other crimes, evaded taxes and refused to pay rent for prime
government property they have held since Marcos’ time; and their weapons—the
Catholic Church and the once most-powerful Yellow media tandem, the Philippine
Daily Inquirer and ABS-CBN TV network.
And lastly, he has demonstrated to have a strong sense of empathy.
What all our past presidents have had, or pretended to have, was
sympathy, which the dictionary defines as “feelings of pity and sorrow for
someone else’s misfortune.” Empathy is not sympathy; it is the “ability to
understand and share the feelings of another.”
Empathy is what Duterte expresses as he embraces the widow of a Marine
killed in action, or shakes the hand of a wounded in a military hospital, often
with misty eyes. The pretension of sympathy is Benigno Aquino 3rd in a wake,
where the camera even catches him guffawing at something that suddenly crossed
his mind.
Human beings, psychologists say, have an innate capacity to sense
empathy. After all, evolutionary scientists claim that this was a virtue for a
tribe’s survival: its members failure to sense strangers’ deceit would have
meant their extermination.
Or perhaps nations are still merely bigger versions of a family, and
Filipinos especially do not see their presidents as merely chief executive
officers or managers of the nation. In their hearts, they yearn for a leader
who reminds them of their father or mother, who understand their feelings.
Indeed, I have detected more people in social media referring to Duterte as
“Tatay Digong.”
Who was the last president Filipinos really saw as “father of the
nation”? No one, really.
I do hope I am right in this analysis. Because if a President can do
what he needs to do even if it is unpopular or would have short-term bad
effects (such as the new tax reform law, TRAIN), and still have much popular
support, I am being optimistic over the future of this sad, unlucky country.
What can you say about this?
Share us your thoughts by simply
leaving on the comment section below. For more news, updates, feel free to
visit our site often.
Stay updated with today's relevant
news and trends by hitting the LIKE button.
Thanks for dropping by and reading
the post
Report from Manila Times
0 Comments